|
|
|
ejmeier@gmail.com |
I had originally named this section "finishing," but to put it bluntly: you ain't done yet! Not even close. So, I changed the name to "varnishing" to avoid any confusion and to clarify that you are still a ways off from being "finished." Different builders will begin finishing their instruments at different times, and during different stages of construction. Personally, I like to finish the instrument before I add the bridge, but after I drill the holes for the pins. I do it before the bridge is added because it is much easier to apply and sand the finish without the protuberance of the bridge blocking me; and I do it after the holes for the pins are drilled because the bit can sometimes mar the finish if you are not careful, and also because all that commotion up on the table of the drill press - with the wood chips of 50 drilled holes flying everywhere - is likely to scratch and rough up the finish. (Not to mention that you have to know where the hitch pins are in order to inlay the note markers.) But when to apply the finish will also depend on the type of finish is used as well. If it is a simple oil finish, it might be safest to drill beforehand. If a thicker film-building finish is used, you may want to apply the finish before drilling the holes for the pins to avoid getting "finish gunk" in the holes. (Or at the very least, clean the holes out with the bit after the finish has dried.) Considering the Attributes of a Finish: Choosing a finish for a musical instrument brings up a lot of the same issues that we have encountered when we were choosing a glue - the things that work for common woodworking tasks may not be ideal for instruments. Because of the huge surface area of the finish, especially on the critical soundboard area, one important question arises when considering finishes - one that never comes up with other woodworking projects. Will this finish inhibit the strings' vibrations as they travel across the wood? This is usually the primary concern with musical instruments, and secondarily comes either the durability and scratch resistance of the finish, or its beauty. Dampening is the primary concern, and this is caused mainly by two things: the hardness of the finish, and the thickness of the finish. What we are really after is a finish that affects the sound as little as possible, (yet still protects and beautifies the wood.) This is commonly called acoustic transparency. Hardness affects the acoustics because a finish that is hard - rather than soft or flexible - will have a less noticeable dampening of the strings' vibrations. Related to this is of course how thick the finish is built up on the instrument. If a thick, heavy coating is present on the soundboard, it will also absorb a lot of the vibrations and keep them from reaching the rest of the instrument. (This is most apparent when paint is used as a finish.) Taking into account the hardness of the finish, many woodworkers will immediately think of polyurethane: after all, it is frequently toted as one of the hardest, and most durable of all wood finishes. However, all the claims are simply based on a confusion of terms: we equate a finish's resistance to be scratched with its hardness. Polyurethane is actually flexible and elastic, which is what helps to give it a high resistance to scratching. However, this means that polyurethane has a high dampening effect on the instrument, which is not what we are after acoustically. And not only that, but it tends to be much thicker than most finishes, so it builds up heavier layers on the instrument - compounding the problem. What we are after is mainly a finish that is brittle. While most finishes that are truly "hard" do not have quite the same scratch resistance as polyurethane, they are superior in terms of acoustics - and with proper care, many have acceptable durability anyway. This isn't a hardwood floor you're walking on! - it's not even a rowdy rock guitar, it's a bowed psaltery. Also, if a finish is not brittle, it may be able to make up for it acoustically by instead being thin. Though with thinner finishes - usually ones that do not build up a film finish on top of the instrument - durability can be compromised. On the upside, they are usually also easy to repair. The most acoustically transparent finishes are those that are both hard and thin. So, now that we have gotten a little bit clearer understanding as to what things to look for in a finish, it's time to look at what options are available that fit these criteria. Finishing Options for Musical Instruments:
Finishing is fairly straightforward. Follow the instructions from the manufacturer closely, and don't cut corners. Patience, I believe, is the key to a good finish. Beyond that, here are a few tidbits of advice that I can offer:
For a progress update on the bowed psaltery that was built as the project for this website, the pores in the Kwila have been filled with a pore-filler, giving the wood a smooth, glassy surface for the finish to sit on. Then several coats of shellac were applied and rubbed out to an even, glossy finish.
Front and back views of the psaltery after pore-filling and sanding
The same psaltery after only one coat of shellac has been applied - the wood comes alive! To me, applying the first coat of finish is probably one of the most satisfying parts of the building process. The wood just leaps to life with color and vibrancy. Notice how much more pronounced the curls in the redwood become under the shellac. Also, this is my first experience using Kwila, but the back and sides look beautiful. The color and grain texture remind me of graham crackers. Yummy! Once the varnishing step has been completed, it's now time to move on to the step of making and fitting the bridge. |
|
|